$650,000 Recovered After a Disputed-Liability Motorcycle Collision in Gulf Shores, Alabama
Publish Date : 02 November 2026
Note: We have changed our client’s name in this case study to protect his privacy.
Tyler was twenty when a driver turned left across his motorcycle in Gulf Shores, throwing him from the bike and causing catastrophic injuries to his right leg, foot, and hand. The crash report blamed Tyler for aggressive operation, and a witness estimated he was traveling about 100 mph. He disputed both. With Alabama’s contributory negligence rule putting the entire claim at risk, the case ultimately resolved through two settlements totaling $650,000.
40+ years of combined legal experience
Free & confidential case evaluations
Home or hospital visits available
Proven Results
Our Record-Setting Verdicts and Settlements
$10M+
Civil Litigation
Settlement involving civil litigation in Alabama
$10M+
Personal Injury
Settlement involving a workplace injury
$8M+
Medical Malpractice
Jury verdict in medical malpractice against OB/GYN in wrongful death of an infant
Why Liability Was Disputed in Tyler’s Motorcycle Accident
In May 2019, Tyler was riding eastbound through an intersection on County Road 8 East in Gulf Shores, Alabama. An SUV traveling in the opposite direction entered a left-turn lane and turned across his path.
Tyler swerved to avoid hitting the SUV broadside. Instead, his motorcycle struck the rear passenger-side quarter panel, and he was ejected from the bike. He was airlifted to a regional hospital with severe injuries to his right leg, foot, and hand.
Liability was disputed from the beginning. The responding officer identified Tyler as the primary contributing unit for aggressive operation, and a bystander gave police a speed estimate of roughly 100 mph. Tyler disputed the report’s conclusions and the speed estimate in his deposition.
The case ultimately resolved through litigation and mediation rather than trial, with fault never fully resolved.
How the Motorcycle Collision Happened
Tyler was traveling east when the other driver, heading west, entered the left-turn lane and crossed his path.
He swerved in an attempt to avoid a direct side impact, struck the SUV’s rear passenger-side quarter panel, and was thrown from his motorcycle.
No passengers were riding in either vehicle. One civilian bystander witnessed the collision and provided the speed estimate that later became part of the liability dispute.
Tyler’s Catastrophic Leg, Foot, and Hand Injuries
According to Tyler’s deposition testimony, every bone in his right foot was crushed, his right femur suffered three compound fractures through the skin, every bone in his right hand was broken, and his right big toe was traumatically amputated.
His treatment included multiple surgical debridements, amputation of the toe, and bone grafts taken from his left knee and right hip.
A rod and screws were placed in his right femur. They were later replaced, and a metal plate was added. Tyler also developed a bone infection at the fracture site that required six weeks of IV antibiotics before another bone graft could be performed.
By his own count, he had undergone at least seven surgeries on the right femur alone.
As of his September 2021 deposition, treatment was still ongoing. His right leg was between half an inch and an inch shorter than his left because of a surgical complication, and another operation was planned to lengthen the femur. In the meantime, he was using a shoe lift and prosthetic toe piece.
No permanent impairment rating had yet been assigned because his medical treatment was not complete.
Attorney Randall Caldwell described the extent of the injuries:
Every bone in his right foot, three compound fractures in the femur, every bone in his right hand, and they took his big toe. He was twenty years old. Seven surgeries on that femur alone before he was through, and then a bone infection on top of it that took six weeks of IV antibiotics. Whatever anybody thinks about how fast he was going, that is what happened to him.
How Alabama’s Contributory Negligence Rule Put the Claim at Risk
The dispute was not simply over how much Tyler’s injuries were worth. The defense challenged whether he was entitled to recover at all.
The crash report’s aggressive-operation finding and the bystander’s speed estimate became part of the defense case. The defense also retained an accident reconstruction expert who was disclosed to testify that Tyler’s speed and lane position caused the collision.
That created substantial risk under Alabama’s contributory negligence rule. If a jury assigned Tyler any share of fault, however small, his recovery could be barred entirely.
The settlement also involved three different insurers: the other driver’s liability carrier and two of Tyler’s own underinsured motorist carriers. Their involvement had to be coordinated before the liability settlement could close.
Reconstruction Evidence and the Driver’s Deposition Supported the Case
Our firm retained a professional engineer as an accident reconstruction expert in June 2020. The defense later disclosed its own professional engineer, who was prepared to offer a different conclusion about Tyler’s speed and position before the collision.
Tyler’s own testimony also challenged the crash report’s version of events.
Another important piece of evidence came from the other driver’s deposition. The firm’s later policy-limits demand argued that her sworn testimony weakened the sudden-emergency defense she was expected to assert.
The defense did not seriously dispute the severity of Tyler’s injuries. The central dispute remained fault.
This was not a clean liability case and I am not going to pretend it was. The officer put my client down as the primary contributing unit, and a bystander guessed he was doing a hundred miles an hour. My client testified he could not tell you what his speed was and he disagreed with the report. Nobody ever resolved that dispute, and in Alabama you do not get to be partly right — if a jury finds one percent against you, you go home with nothing. So we worked the case up, we hired our own reconstructionist, and we resolved it at mediation with fault never conceded on either side.
C. Randall Caldwell, Jr.
How the Case Reached a $650,000 Settlement
In October 2021, the firm sent a policy-limits demand to the other driver’s liability carrier. The demand sought the full liability limits within ten days and was contingent on approval from Tyler’s underinsured motorist carriers.
The demand emphasized the severity of Tyler’s injuries and argued that the other driver’s own deposition undermined her anticipated sudden-emergency defense.
Discovery continued, and the parties attended mediation in February 2022.
That process resulted in a $600,000 settlement funded jointly by the other driver’s liability carrier and one of Tyler’s underinsured motorist carriers.
A second settlement followed in March 2022, when Tyler’s other underinsured motorist carrier agreed to pay $50,000.
With accident reconstruction experts prepared to offer competing accounts of the collision, Alabama’s contributory negligence rule created the risk that a finding of any fault against Tyler could eliminate his recovery. The case resolved at mediation rather than putting that all-or-nothing question before a jury.
The Settlement: $650,000 Across Two Settlements
Tyler’s total recovery was $650,000.
The first settlement was $600,000, funded jointly by the other driver’s liability insurer and one of Tyler’s underinsured motorist carriers. The second was a separate $50,000 settlement from another underinsured motorist carrier.
The settlement paperwork reflected $215,139.09 in liens against the $600,000 recovery across four claimants.
The largest was a health insurance subrogation claim. It was reduced by $100,015.06, from roughly $250,000 to $150,022.56. Two smaller lien amounts were still being held in trust pending final negotiation when the settlement paperwork was completed.
Tyler’s combined net recovery from the two settlements was $169,623.35.
After a TV law firm denied my case, I was left alone with hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills. Caldwell Wenzel and Asthana obtained evidence proving what really happened, handled everything, and got my family the money we deserved. I can’t be more thankful, and I’d recommend them to anyone who’s been turned down elsewhere.
Tyler,
Caldwell Wenzel and Asthana Personal Injury Lawyers client
What Tyler’s Case Says About Our Approach
Tyler’s case reflects how our motorcycle accident lawyers in Alabama approach serious injury claims when the evidence is not neatly in our client’s favor from the start. We do not assume a crash report tells the whole story, and we do not avoid difficult cases simply because liability is disputed.
We investigate beyond the police report
When the report identified Tyler as the primary contributing driver, we developed independent evidence rather than accepting that conclusion at face value.
We bring in the right experts when fault is contested
Retaining our own reconstruction engineer allowed us to test the defense’s version of how the collision happened.
We use discovery to pressure-test the other side’s defenses
The other driver’s deposition gave us evidence to challenge her anticipated sudden-emergency argument.
We evaluate risk as carefully as we build value
Alabama’s contributory negligence rule made this an all-or-nothing liability case, so every decision had to account for the possibility of a complete defense verdict.
We look at every available source of recovery
Resolving the case required coordinating the other driver’s liability coverage with two separate underinsured motorist policies.
Tyler’s case did not begin with an easy liability picture. It ended with a $650,000 recovery because we kept developing the evidence, challenged the version of the crash working against him, and pursued every available layer of insurance coverage.
Explore Our Other Case Studies
Caldwell Wenzel and Asthana Personal Injury Lawyers represents injury victims across Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida. Explore our other case studies to see how we’ve handled serious injury claims, disputed liability, and complex insurance issues.
$575,000
Settlement After a Fairhope Rear-End Collision
After a serious rear-end crash led to two surgeries and a disputed insurance coverage issue, Caldwell Wenzel and Asthana Personal Injury Lawyers helped secure a $575,000 settlement for the injured client.
Read case study
$250,000
Recovery After an Orange Beach Police Chase Collision
A retired teacher was injured when a driver fleeing police crashed into his car. We secured $250,000 through his own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage.
Read case studyTalk to Caldwell Wenzel and Asthana Personal Injury Lawyers About Your Case
If a motorcycle crash report places fault on you, that does not necessarily end the inquiry. Our Alabama motorcycle accident attorneys can review the available evidence, insurance coverage, and circumstances of the collision and explain your options.